Home » Blog » Rhetorical Analysis of Sample with Pathos, Logos, Ethos

Rhetorical Analysis of Sample with Pathos, Logos, Ethos

Rhetorical Analysis of “Is North Korea Causing Trouble or Giving Peace a Chance”
The article by the New York Times Editorial Board to shows how North Korea has engaged in delegations to promote peace. The article is represented by the topic ‘‘Is North Korea Causing Trouble or Giving Peace a Chance?” The Editorial Board states that the presidents of the two Koreas were seen together at the opening of the Winter Olympics. This action hinted the first step to delegation between the two countries advocating for peace. The author also hopes that the opening of Winter Olympics will nurture other chances for South Korea to engage North Korea over the talk of nuclear bombing.

Pathos, Logos, Ethos

The author has appealed to logic, ethics, and emotions in this piece of writing. The article has displayed the use of pathos from how the author has paraded how people feel that the meeting between the two countries will result in peaceful negotiations. In this case, the author makes the audience happy because hope is evident when North and South Korea Presidents met in the opening games. The author also has a positive feeling that North Korea will engage in some peace talks with South Korea. However, the author explains how some officials of North and South Korea did not greet each other since they still feel that the two countries are not at peace. Therefore, this invokes the readers to have some emotional touch on the issues affecting the two countries.

The Editorial Board has used ethos on how North Korea and South Korea have mixed feelings of whether they will patch things up. The author parades how North Korea is likely to exploit and depend on South Korea for other economic benefits, instead of promoting peace talks. As the Editorial Board claims, South Korea might be exploited by North Korea to ensure that they acquire coalition with other nations like the United States. At this point, the reader is left questioning the interests behind the need for peace.

Lastly, the use of logos is evident from how the author is trying to reason out with the audience, on whether the two counties will have peace at last. From the article, the author states questions like ‘‘Can the Winter Games be nudged and nurtured into serious dialogue over North Korea’s nuclear program?’’ to explain how it is not an easy situation for North Korea to come into terms with peace talks. In this case, the author shows some truth since North Korea is known to be ‘tough-headed’ when it comes to peace negotiations.

The New York Times Editorial Board was successful in applying the three rhetorical strategies while writing ‘‘Is North Korea Causing Trouble or Giving Peace a Chance?” The use of logos, pathos, and ethos is evident because we can relate to the emotional aspect of the issues that the two countries as trying to resolve. Moreover, with logos and ethos, we can question the ethical and logical factors driving the two leaders to seek peace and the prospects of achieving it.

Work Cited
The Editorial Board. Is North Korea Causing Trouble or Giving Peace a Chance? The New York Times. Feb. 13, 2018. www.nytimes.com/2018/02/13/opinion/olympics-north-korea-sister.html

Pay someone to do my paper

How to Write a Sociology Paper

How to Write a Good DBQ AP World

How to Write a Case Study

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more